Uncertain Health in
an Insecure World – 28
“Ebola – So Over It”
Beatrice Yardolo, Liberia’s last active Ebola case was released
from hospital on March 5, 2015. Liberia’s deputy health minister, Tolbert
Nyenswah, declared “victory” in their
fight against Ebola. This was no doubt a
pyrrhic victory for Ms. Yardolo (in yellow) – 3 of her children died from Ebola!
The U.S. Ebola emergency began when Thomas Eric Duncan was
diagnosed in Dallas on September 30, 2014 – Mr. Duncan died on October 8, 2014.
The subsequent infection of a Dallas hospital healthcare work who contacted Mr.
Duncan, and the return of a medical doctor to New York City from Guinea, raised
U.S. public health and political concerns to a fever pitch.
In 5 short months, the Ebola crisis has gone from 800 new
cases a day to zero! Previously affected countries of Nigeria, Senegal, Mali, Spain,
the U.S. and U.K. are currently free of active Ebola virus disease (EVD).
Sierra Leone remains an EVD ‘hot zone’,
with one patient and ten exposed health workers now returning to the U.S. for
treatment at specially equipped hospitals.
According to U.S. CDC and WHO counts, the current death toll
from the 2014-15 West African EVD epidemic stands at 10,096, or 41% mortality
among those infected. Ill-prepared small economy West African countries saw the
greatest mortality, using only isolation & quarantine techniques to contain
the outbreaks and “supportive care”
to treat the infected.
Until recently, active treatment protocols using ZMapp and
anecdotal infusions of survivors’ blood serum were relegated to small numbers
of infected foreign aid workers, and were often administered once they had
returned for care in their home countries. In late February 2015, San Diego’s
Mapp Biopharmaceutical began ZMapp versus supportive care clinical trial in
Liberia.
The fall 2014 scramble by leading anti-viral Pharma
companies and government regulatory agencies to generate clinical effectiveness
data through West African clinical trials has generated some progress. A Japan
Fujifilm antiviral, favipiravir, was administered to 60 Ebola patients treated
at MSF centers in Guinea in December, 2014 using historical controls – results
are pending. Two public-private partnerships involving the NIH & GlaxoSmithKline
and the Canadian government & Merck produced vaccine versus placebo trials
in 18,000 Liberian health and emergency workers in February 2015.
Were western drug approval rules promulgated by the U.S. FDA
and NIH being brought to bear on Ebola research a version of “unfair trade”? Is it realistic to expect
that the FDA’s typical clinical trial requirements for proving drug efficacy
& safety involving hundreds to thousands of patients be applied to such remote
acute infectious outbreaks?
In the fall of 2014, this academic debate raged among “experts” on the pages of high-impact
medical journals such as Lancet and
the New England Journal of Medicine.
Epidemiologists understand bio-statistics. As international
health experts in tropical diseases, they know that the bloom of acute
infectious disease cases is terribly transient. Whether treating those acutely
infected or vaccinating those at greatest risk, there may be insufficient big
data generated to draw scientifically robust conclusions.
Clinical trialists and Pharma understand randomized placebo-controlled
trials. Traditional clinical trials of new drugs for the chronic diseases
impacting the global health of millions are safety-first by FDA design. The
WHO, Wellcome Trust and MSF medical ethicists have pushed for fast-tracked drug
studies without a placebo control study arm.
So who is right?
So who is right?
Senior WHO officials have decried the low number of Ebola
cases now available for study, and the related opportunities missed to test
potential therapies and vaccines. Chimerix Inc.’s clinical trial of an
antiviral drug, brincidofovir, at MSF-run medical centers was recently cancelled
due to the lack of new Ebola cases.
The global health panic that was “Fear-Bola” is over.
But there is still a crying need for rapid response times
and alternative clinical trial designs for deadly infectious diseases like
Ebola with a 41% acute mortality rate.
Absent such bold innovations, for its victims, Ebola is over
in three short weeks!
Observing from afar, we in the Square think that WHO is right.
Observing from afar, we in the Square think that WHO is right.
No comments:
Post a Comment